🔗 Share this article

When dawn crept over the Amazonian city of Belém on Saturday morning, representatives remained trapped in a airless conference room, unaware whether it was day or night. Having spent 12 hours in strained discussions, with numerous ministers representing various coalitions of countries ranging from the poorest nations to the richest economies.

Frustration mounted, the air stifling as sweaty delegates acknowledged the harsh reality: they were unlikely to achieve a comprehensive agreement in Brazil. The international climate negotiations teetered on the brink of abject failure.

The sticking point: Fossil fuels

Research has demonstrated for nearly a century, the carbon dioxide produced by utilizing fossil fuels is increasing temperatures on our planet to critical levels.

Nevertheless, during more than three decades of regular climate meetings, the crucial requirement to halt fossil fuel use has been addressed only once – in a resolution made two years ago at previous UN climate talks to "move beyond fossil fuels". Representatives from the Gulf states, Russia, and multiple other countries were determined this would not be repeated.

Mounting support for change

At the same time, a increasing coalition of countries were just as committed that movement on this issue was urgently necessary. They had developed a initiative that was earning growing support and made it evident they were willing to hold firm.

Developing countries urgently needed to make progress on securing funding support to help them cope with the increasingly severe impacts of environmental crises.

Critical moment

During the night of Saturday, some delegates were willing to leave and cause breakdown. "The situation was precarious for us," stated one energy minister. "I was ready to walk away."

The pivotal moment came through negotiations with Saudi Arabia. Shortly after 6am, key negotiators split from the main group to hold a private conversation with the chief Saudi negotiator. They urged wording that would obliquely recognise the global commitment to "shift from fossil fuels" made two years earlier in Dubai.

Unanticipated resolution

Instead of explicitly namechecking fossil fuels, the text would refer to "the previous commitment". Following reflection, the Saudi delegation unexpectedly agreed to the wording.

The room collapsed into relief. Applause rang out. The deal was completed.

With what became known as the "Amazon accord", the world took a modest advance towards the gradual elimination of fossil fuels – a faltering, inadequate step that will barely interrupt the climate's ongoing trajectory towards catastrophe. But nevertheless a significant departure from absolute paralysis.

Important aspects of the agreement

• Complementing the subtle acknowledgment in the legally agreed text, countries will start developing a roadmap to systematically reduce fossil fuels
• This will be primarily a optional undertaking led by Brazil that will deliver findings next year
• Addressing the essential decreases in greenhouse gas emissions to stay within the 1.5C limit was similarly postponed to next year
• Developing countries secured a significant expansion to $120bn of yearly funding to help them manage the impacts of environmental crises
• This sum will not be fully available until 2035
• Workers will benefit from a "equitable change process" to help people working in fossil fuel sectors shift to the clean economy

Differing opinions

As the world hovers near the brink of climate "irreversible changes" that could destroy ecosystems and plunge whole regions into crisis, the agreement was far from the "giant leap" needed.

"Cop30 gave us some baby steps in the right direction, but in light of the scale of the climate crisis, it has failed to rise to the occasion," cautioned one environmental analyst.

This flawed deal might have been the maximum achievable, given the international tensions – including a US president who avoided the talks and remains committed to oil and coal, the growing influence of nationalist politics, ongoing conflicts in different locations, extreme measures of inequality, and global economic instability.

"Major polluters – the oil and gas companies – were finally in the crosshairs at these negotiations," says one environmental advocate. "We have crossed a threshold on that. The political space is open. Now we must turn it into a genuine solution to a more secure planet."

Significant divisions revealed

Although nations were able to applaud the gavelling through of the deal, Cop30 also exposed deep fissures in the primary worldwide framework for addressing the climate crisis.

"UN negotiations are unanimity-required, and in a period of geopolitical divides, consensus is increasingly difficult to reach," observed one senior UN official. "It would be dishonest to claim that this summit has achieved complete success that is needed. The gap between where we are and what research requires remains alarmingly large."

Should the world is to avert the most severe impacts of climate breakdown, the international negotiations alone will not be nearly enough.